Carter v. Industrial Commission
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStraup, J.
This is an application for a writ of mandamus to require the Industrial Commission to hear a cause alleged to be pending before it and which it refuses to hear. In the petition for the writ it in substance is alleged that Carter, the petitioner, on May 13, 1928, and prior thereto in Wasatch county was in the employ of the Cedar Construction Com pany whose insurance liability under the industrial act was carried by the state and payable out of the state insurance fund managed and controlled by the Industrial Commision. On the day stated and while in the employ of the construction company and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bartlett Hayward Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Salt Lake City v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1923
- Parkman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Ind. Comm. of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1929
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1927
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Wammack v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1958
- Frito-Lay v. Utah Labor CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- Rosenquist v. O'Neil & PrestonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Louisville N. R. Co. v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
- Spencer v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1955
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.