Legal Opinion

Salt Lake City v. Industrial Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1923No. 3936PublishedCited by 35 opinions

Proceedings under the Workmen’s Compensation Act by Thomas Fisher, opposed by Salt Lake City, employer. An award of compensation was allowed by the Industrial Commission, and the employer brings certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtThurman, J.

This case comes before us on a writ of certiorari to review the proceedings 'of the Industrial Commission of Utah in the matter of an award of compensation' to one Thomas Fisher for an injury alleged to have been sustained while in the employment of the plaintiff November 1, 1920.

The record of the case is somewhat confusing on account of the irregular method adopted in its compilation. We will endeavor, however to unravel the tangled skein by presenting the main features of the case in chronological order.

On November 1, 1920, Thomas Fisher, while in the employment of Salt Lake City as a…

2Cited by35 opinions

  1. Utah Department of Administrative Services v. Public Service CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Chittenden v. JarvisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
  3. King v. Alabam's Freight Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1932
  4. McGarry v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Utah Dept. of Admin. Serv. v. Pub. Serv. Com'nUtah Supreme Court · 1983

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API