Legal Opinion

Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Ind. Comm. of Utah

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1929No. 4686PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThurman, C. J.

This is a proceeding to review an award for additional compensation under the provisions of the Utah Industrial Act (Comp. Laws 1917, §§ 3061-3165).

On April 9, 1924, the defendant Manuel Mileusnic, while in the employ of the plaintiff mining company, was: injured as the result of an accident in the course of his employment. The mining company was an employer under the provisions of the Industrial Act, and the plaintiff insurance company carried the insurance. The nature of the injury sustained by Mileusnic will be referred to hereinafter in connection with the findings. Mileusnic was confined…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Bartlett Hayward Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  2. United States Casualty Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  3. Estate of Beckwith v. SpoonerMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Globe Indemnity Co. v. LankfordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  5. Salt Lake City v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1923

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Doby v. Miami Trust Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Hansen v. Utah State Retirement BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Vigos v. Mountainland Builders, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Waite v. Utah Labor Comm'nUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Carter v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1930

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API