Legal Opinion

Frito-Lay v. Utah Labor Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 2009No. 20080818PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURRANT, Associate Chief Justice:

INTRODUCTION

{1 This appeal arises from Amy Claus-ing's claim against Frito-Lay and its insurance carrier, Transcontinental Insurance Co. (collectively, "Frito-Lay"), for temporary disability compensation under the Utah Workers' Compensation Act. It raises three issues that we must resolve: (1) whether the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure, and specifically rule 60, are applicable to administrative proceedings; (2) whether the Utah Labor Commission has statutory authority similar to the authority a district court would have under rule 60 to modify a former order;…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Bailey v. BaylesUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Myers v. McDonaldUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Menzies v. GaletkaUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Brown & Root Industrial Service v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Nebeker v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2001

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Leo P. Pratt, III v. Andrew Pallito, Commissioner, Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
  2. Rawlings v. RawlingsUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. RuizUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Zions Management Services v. RecordUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Employers' Reinsurance Fund v. Labor CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2012

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API