Legal Opinion
Rosenquist v. O'Neil & Preston
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 25, 1932No. 29,079PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Certiorari to the industrial commission.
May 26, 1927, petitioner suffered occupational injury. His expenses of treatment and hospitalization ($941.65) were paid by the insurer, as was also compensation. The latter continued to July 5, 1928, a period of 58 iveeks, the total being $1,044. Asserting that the employe had fully recovered, the insurer then discontinued payments. Thereafter, but not until May 13, 1930, he filed a petition for additional compensation. It came on for hearing before the referee September 4, 1930. He adjourned the hearing and ordered hospitalization of petitioner for…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bartlett Hayward Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Ogrosky v. Commonwealth Electric Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Carter v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1930
- Kallgren v. C. W. Lunquist Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- State ex rel. Klemer v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Beck v. GroeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Anchor Casualty Co. v. BONGARDS CO-OPERATIVE CREAMERY ASSN.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Roos v. City of MankatoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- McCaleb v. JacksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- DeMars v. Robinson King Floors, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.