Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Howard v. Lockheed Martin Corp.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided June 28, 2007No. 1:99-mj-00285PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS
DLOTT, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Lockheed Martin Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss Second Amended and Consolidated Complaint (doc. 65) pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 8, 9(b), and 12(b)(6). Relators Donald E. Howard, Larry W. Wilson, Charles Harrison, and Morris Moss have brought this qui tarn action under the fraud provisions and the retaliation provision of the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)(1), (2), and (3), and § 3730(h), respectively. Lockheed moves to dismiss the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Edwin P. Harrison, and United States of America, Party in Interest v. Westinghouse Savannah River CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Alan Weiner, D.P.M. v. Klais and Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Black v. RomanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Foster v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2008
- Dooley v. Wells Fargo BankDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
- Merritt v. Mountain Laurel Chalets, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2015
- United States ex rel. Winkler v. BAE Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2013
- United States of America v. RakineDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023