United States ex rel. Winkler v. BAE Systems, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF NO. 22)
PAUL D. BORMAN, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant BAE Systems, Inc. (“BAE”) Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 22.) Plaintiff filed a response (ECF No. 25) and BAE filed a reply (ECF No. 26). The Court held a hearing on March 27, 2013. For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS the motion to dismiss.
INTRODUCTION
This is a qui tam action brought by Plaintiff-Relator Michael Winkler (“Plaintiff,” “Relator,” or “Winkler”) pursuant to the Federal False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 et seq. against Defendant BAE…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Bassett v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Directv, Inc. And Echostar Satellite L.L.C. v. Mark Treesh, Commissioner for the Department of Revenue for the State of KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Quicken Loans Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
- Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan v. Bond Pharmacy, Inc. d/b/a Advanced Infusion SolutionsDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2024
- United States of America v. Miraca Life Sciences, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2020
- United States v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LPDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019