Legal Opinion

Black v. Romano

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided July 1, 1985No. 84-465PublishedCited by 544 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

In this case we consider whether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment generally requires a sentencing court to indicate that it has considered alternatives to incarceration before revoking probation. After a hearing, a state judge found that respondent had violated his probation conditions by committing a felony shortly after his original prison sentences were suspended. The judge revoked probation and ordered respondent to begin serving the previously im*608posed sentences. Nearly six years later, the District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri held that respondent had been…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by544 opinions

  1. Cox v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Woods v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Richard Joseph Belk v. James D. PurkettCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  4. State v. Di FriscoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  5. United States v. Michael PattersonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020

539 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API