Legal Opinion
Dooley v. Wells Fargo Bank
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided April 19, 2013No. Case No. 3:12-cv-290PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
MICHAEL R. MERZ, United States Magistrate Judge.
This case is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 11). Plaintiffs oppose the Motion (Doc. No. 12) and Defendant has filed a Reply in support (Doc. No. 13).
A motion to dismiss involuntarily is a dispositive motion on which a Magistrate Judge is ordinarily required to file a report and recommendations. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). However, the parties here unanimously consented to plenary magistrate judge jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) in their Rule…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Miller v. CurrieCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sheen v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Fixel v. LSMJ1, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2023
- GGB Management Company v. J.P. Farley CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2023
- Muhammad v. PNC Financial ServicesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025
- Sheen v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.