Legal Opinion

Miller v. Seaman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 8, 1939No. Appeal, 218PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, P. J.,

This case, while concerned with the same subject matter as was involved in Brosnan’s Appeal, 129 Pa. Superior Ct. 411, 195 A. 469 — affirmed in 330 Pa. 161, 198 A. 629 — has to do with a wholly different legal question.

Appellant is the owner of a lot of ground (No. 3 on the Miller plan of lots) situated on the northwest corner of Penn and Homewood Avenues in the City of Pittsburgh, and containing 4414 square feet of ground. Penn Avenue and Homewood Avenue join at this point at an obtuse angle. The lot is 40 feet front on Penn Avenue and 100 feet deep, on the west side,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. White's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Taylor v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Taylor v. Haverford TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Herskovits Et Ux. v. IrwinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Truitt v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Lord AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Medinger AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Flora Realty & Investment Co. v. City of LadueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  4. Independent School District v. ChristiansenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
  5. Orwell Township Supervisors v. JewettCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API