Legal Opinion

Lord Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 27, 1951No. Appeal, 127PublishedCited by 136 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Bell,

Does the antenna mast which the petitioner-appellant intends to build in the back yard of his home and which is used for amateur radio communication violate the ordinance of the Borough of Munhall; and if so, does the ordinance violate the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States, or the Constitution of Pennsylvania?

Appellant is a licensed amateur radio operator. He had for many years an antenna in and on top of his house; he operates his station solely for pleasure and wants to increase its efficiency so that he can communicate with…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Eubank v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Spann v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Spann v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1921

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by136 opinions

  1. National Land & Investment Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Robinson Township v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Archbishop O'Hara's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Schubach v. SilverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Cleaver v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

131 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API