Legal Opinion

Flora Realty & Investment Co. v. City of Ladue

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 11, 1952No. 42103PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDalton, J.

Action in equity to have zoning ordinance No. 282 of the city of Ladue declared unconstitutional and void insofar as it restricts the use of plaintiff’s property. Plaintiff is the owner of approximately 104 acres of real estate (acquired in 1911) in said city and the zoning ordinance placed this property in the “A” three acre minimum area one family residence district, wherein institutional use is forbidden except by special permit, as provided in said ordinance. 'Plaintiff charged that the ordinance, insofar as it classified plaintiff’s property in District “A” and restricted the use…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Washington Ex Rel. Seattle Title Trust Co. v. RobergeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Zahn v. Board of Public WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Welch v. SwaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1909

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Bilbar Construction Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Board of Appeals of Hanover v. Housing Appeals Comm.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  3. Hoffmann v. KinealySupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  4. Huttig v. City of Richmond HeightsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  5. Fischer v. Township of BedminsterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API