Legal Opinion

Herskovits Et Ux. v. Irwin

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 13, 1930No. Appeal, 30; Appeal, 31PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Moschzisker,

This case involves the right of a property owner to obtain a permit for the erection of a building where the specifications comply with existing law but conflict with the terms of a proposed zoning ordinance.

Bernath Herskovits and wife owned a lot in the Township of Mount Lebanon, which they purchased as the site for an apartment house. On June 26, 1929, they made application to the township building inspector for a permit to construct a six-story apartment building, submitting plans which, so far as the matters covered by them went, complied with the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Buffalo v. . ChadeayneNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. State ex rel. Klefisch v. Wisconsin Telephone Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  3. General Baking Co. v. Street CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  4. Pelham View Apartments, Inc. v. SwitzerNew York Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Coyne v. PrichardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Breinig v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Taylor v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Trans-Oceanic Oil Corp. v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Lhormer v. BowenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. Ventresca v. ExleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API