Legal Opinion

Sweet v. Henderson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 4, 1919No. 8689PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error from District Court, Payne County; A. H. Huston. Judge. Action by L. B. Sweet against F. A. Henderson and 27 others. Judgment for defendants, motion for new trial overruled, and plaintiff -brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, J.

This was an action brought to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the alleged negligence of certain defendants in maintaining a telephone wire across the public highway.

The petition alleges that the plaintiff was driving on the public highway in a covered wagon, and the defendants were maintaining their telephone wire across the public highway so low that it caught the top or cover on the wagon, thereby jerking the top and box of the wage -n from the gears; the iffain-tiff being thrown to the ground and injured. To this petition the defendants filed their answer, which was a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. DuranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. HartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. LongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Wichita Falls & N. W. R. Co. v. WoodmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Suburban Electric Co. v. NugentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mascho v. HinesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. HarpoleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Incorporated Town of Wetumka v. BurkeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Varela v. ReidArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Goodrich v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API