Legal Opinion

Mascho v. Hines

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 24, 1923No. 11240PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

-Opinion toy

RAY, O.

This is an action against the Director General of Railroads for damages for the destruction of an automobile truck by a passenger train on the A., T. & S. F. Railway at a crossing near the town of Davenport on the 19th day of November, 1918. Judgment Was for the defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

While it is contended that the verdict was not sustained by sufficient evidence and was contrary to law, the principal contention of the plaintiff in error is that the court failed to instruct the jury upon the plaintiff’s theory of the case, and that the jury was misled by the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clark v. St. L. & S. F. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Wichita Falls & N. W. R. Co. v. WoodmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Littlejohn v. Midland Valley R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Rose v. CochranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. Sweet v. HendersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Miller v. PriceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Missouri K. & T. Ry. Co. v. PerinoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. McKeeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  4. Russell v. MargoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. HarpoleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API