Legal Opinion

Goodrich v. City of Tulsa

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 7, 1924No. 13538PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

This was an action by Harold B. Goodrich against the city of Tulsa, and the First Christian Church of Tulsa, for injuries alleged to have been received by the negligent stretching of a rope by defendants, more particularly the officers of the city of Tulsa, across one of the streets in Tulsa, to wit, Boulder avenue.

The defendant First Christian Church was eliminated from the action by the court below on the ground of lack of evidence of negligence on its part, and is eliminated here also, but made a party defendant in error, as plaintiff in error says in his brief, out of abundance of caution.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. DuranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. HartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. LongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Osage Coal & Mining Co. v. SperraSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Sweet v. HendersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Miller v. PriceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  2. Bucktrot v. PartridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Banta v. HestandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  4. Safe-Way Cab Service Co. v. GadberrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  5. Midland Valley R. Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API