Legal Opinion

Belling v. Harn

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1974No. 195PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.

Was the wife a resident of the same household as her husband at the time of the accident here involved? If she was, she was covered by the automobile liability policy secured by her husband. which defined “named insured” to include “his spouse, if a resident of the same household.” At the time of the accident the wife and husband were voluntarily living separate and apart, the husband leaving the family home following the commencement of divorce proceedings by the wife.

The expressions, “resident of household,” “member of family,” and the like often appear in automobile liability policies “in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pamperin v. Milwaukee Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  2. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. v. MacaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Doern v. CrawfordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Herbst v. HansenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lecus v. American Mutual Insurance Co. of BostonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Wainscott v. OssenkopAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Londre v. Continental Western InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
  4. Plymouth Farmers Mutual Insurance Ass'n v. RasmussenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  5. Bauer v. USAA Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API