Wainscott v. Ossenkop
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*239OPINION
RABINO WITZ, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from the entry of summary judgment against, and denial of a summary judgment in favor of, Robert N. Wainscott, individually and as personal representative of the estate of Deborah K. Wainscott, appellant’s daughter.1 The main issue presented is whether Deborah came within the definition of an “additional insured” under Wainscott’s policy with State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (“State Farm”), the appellee. We hold that summary judgment should have been granted to Wainscott rather than State Farm, and accordingly reverse.
Some facts are not…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Stordahl v. Government Employees Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Cal-Farm Insurance v. BoisserancCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1963
- Continental Insurance Company v. BussellAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
- Miller v. US Fidel. & Guar. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Gordinier v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Forbes v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Averett v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Simmons v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
- Dugan v. Atlanta Casualty CompaniesAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.