National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. v. Maca
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
1. Does Robert Maca have an interest sufficient to permit him to appeal from the judgment? Plaintiff insurance company argues that Robert has no interest in the. policy, cannot maintain an action thereon against plaintiff, and is not a party aggrieved by the judgment.
Under Condition 7 of the policy, Robert would, however, be entitled to recover under the policy after first securing a judgment determining Louis’ liability to him. Plaintiff does not claim that the declaration of no coverage in the judgment binds Robert only with respect to his claim for medical payments, nor that he was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Arthur v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Tomlyanovich v. TomlyanovichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Lontkowski v. IgnarskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Megal v. KohlhardtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Town of Carlton v. State Department of Public WelfareWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Pamperin v. Milwaukee Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Cobb v. State Security Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1979
- Firemen's Insurance Co. of Newark v. ViktoraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Limpert v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- A.G. Ex Rel. Waite v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.