Pamperin v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtConnor T. Hansen, J.
We first consider the issue of whether the trial court erred in refusing to direct a verdict in favor of the defendant and to determine as a matter of law that Karin Kaminsky was not a resident of her uncle’s household at the time of the accident.
It is well settled that a case may be taken from the jury and decided as a matter of law:
“ ‘ “. . . only when the evidence gives rise to no dispute as to the material issues or only when the evidence is so clear and convincing as reasonably to permit unbiased and impartial minds to come to but one conclusion.” . . .’” Eden v. La Crosse Lutheran…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. v. MacaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Lontkowski v. IgnarskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
- Doern v. CrawfordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Giese v. KarstedtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Raymond v. Century Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Workman v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- Lecus v. American Mutual Insurance Co. of BostonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Firemen's Insurance Co. of Newark v. ViktoraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- A.G. Ex Rel. Waite v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. GranilloCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.