Legal Opinion

Peak v. Jurgens

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 28, 1935No. Civ. 9250PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES, J., pro tem.

This is an action brought by the appellant to recover a real estate broker’s commission which he claimed to be due him from respondent. Judgment went for defendant and respondent in the court below, on a trial; and this appeal is taken from that judgment.

The facts as disclosed by the record, or such of them as are necessary to the determination of the issues presented by the appeal, are these: The plaintiff was a licensed real estate broker. The defendant was the owner of certain lands in San Rafael, Marin County, known as the “Hotel Rafael Property”. Plaintiff procured…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ford v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Dunne v. ColombCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Lesser v. W.B. McGerry Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1932

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cochran v. EllsworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Ridgway v. ChaseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Stromer v. BrowningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. McGill v. FlemingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Kish v. Bay Counties Title Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API