Legal Opinion
Cochran v. Ellsworth
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 7, 1954No. Civ. 19951PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOSK, J. pro tem.*
Desiring to sell his real property, consisting of 480 acres, the entire town of Stanfield, Arizona, respondent, Earle Ellsworth in January, 1950, listed the property with Hapeman-McDonald, real estate brokers, in Riverside, California. Shortly thereafter appellant, a real estate broker licensed in California, but not in Arizona, learned of the listing, advertised the property and made efforts to obtain a purchaser.
On March 5, 1950, respondent informed appellant that the agency of Hapeman-McDonald was being revoked but that appellant could continue his efforts to sell the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Woodbine v. Van HornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Lawrence Block Co. v. PalstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Bank of Yolo v. Sperry Flour Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Johnson v. AllenUtah Supreme Court · 1945
- Tillman v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- American Motorists Insurance v. ARTRA Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Consul Limited, Kenneth B. Wilson Dba Ken Wilson Associates v. Solide Enterprises, Inc., a Corporation, and Hrh Operating Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- DuBarry International, Inc. v. Southwest Forest Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- Tanenbaum v. Sylvan Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Consolidated World Investments, Inc. v. Lido Preferred Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1992
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.