Ford v. Brown
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. " J. 0. B. Hebhard, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
This action is brought to recover commissions, upon a sale of real estate made by brokers. TJmhsen &' Co. were *552employed by defendant, Margaret Brown, to sell certain real estate belonging to her. This contract of employment is dated February 5, 1890, and gave the brokers authority to sell the real estate “for the sum .of $15,500, or any less sum hereafter fixed by me, their employment to continue for ninety days- from date, and thereafter until notified by me in writing. I agree to pay them $500 of purchase price when property is sold, or a purchaser found.” In March, 1891, the brokers found…
2Cited by21 opinions
- Haigler v. DonnellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Olson v. PenkertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Smith v. BlodgetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- McInerney v. MackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Kennedy v. MerickelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.