Legal Opinion

Lesser v. W.B. McGerry Co., Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 24, 1932No. Docket No. 7162PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

■ DOOLING, J., pro tem.

In this action the plaintiff and appellant, Lesser, sued to recover from defendants and respondents, who are real estate brokers, the sum of $1,000 received by such brokers as a deposit or down payment from the proposed purchasers of certain real property belonging to Lesser, under a contract negotiated by said brokers. From a judgment for defendants Lesser appeals.

It appears that the property had been listed for sale with respondents by one Berry acting under an oral authorization only from Lesser. Subsequently respondents secured a contract with Peter J. Finocchio and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sill v. CeschiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Nunez v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Ford v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Dunne v. ColombCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Dermody v. New Jersey Realties, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1925

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cochran v. EllsworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Hoyt v. Wasatch Homes, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Christie v. Commercial Casualty Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Peak v. JurgensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Nicoud v. BoleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API