Legal Opinion
McGill v. Fleming
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 10, 1939No. Civ. 12150PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.
Plaintiff commenced this action to recover a sum alleged to be due for services rendered by himself and M. E. McCreery as real estate brokers. He prosecutes this appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant.
Defendant, owner of two vacant pieces of real estate in Beverly Hills and in Los Angeles, employed plaintiff’s firm to secure leases on the properties from the Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, hereinafter referred to as the company. On May 18, 1936, defendant signed an agreement in the following words:
* ‘ McGill-McCreery
“9527 Santa Monica Blvd.
“Beverly Hills, California.
“Gentlemen:…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Alison v. ChapmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- Leventritt v. CowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Ball v. California Conserving Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Connor v. RigginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
- Peak v. JurgensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cochran v. EllsworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Ford v. Palisades Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1950
- Ridgway v. ChaseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Denbo v. Weston Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
- Sanstrum v. GonserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.