Legal Opinion

Stromer v. Browning

California Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1966No. Sac. 7750PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, after a nonjury trial, in a suit to recover a broker’s commission for the sale of real property.

Facts: In June 1958 defendant gave plaintiff, a broker, oral authority to find a buyer for a 2200-acre ranch which defendant owned, excepting therefrom 73 acres which he planned to use as a duck club. A 5 percent commission was fixed.

Plaintiff drew up a descriptive brochure, and defendant gave him the names of several prospects.

In September 1958 the Wilbur brothers submitted a purchase offer for $475,000 through plaintiff.

On September 24,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Spinney v. DowningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Coulter v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Cochran v. EllsworthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Realty Bonds & Finance Co. v. Point Richmond Canal & Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Kessinger v. Organic Fertilizers, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hawran v. HixsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Stromer v. BrowningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  3. R. J. Kuhl Corp. v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Seck v. FoulksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Craig v. MargraveNevada Supreme Court · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API