Legal Opinion

Soldo v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 13, 2003No. CIV.A.98-1712PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

LEE, District Judge.

Introduction

This pharmaceutical products liability action was originally filed by the plaintiff, Lisa A. Soldo, in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey which transferred the action to this Court because the plaintiff is a resident of Pennsylvania and also because Pennsylvania is the situs where she allegedly suffered an in-tracerebral hemorrhage as a result of her ingestion of Parlodel®, a drug manufactured and marketed by the defendant and also where she received most of her medical treatment.

The Court has…

2Cases cited80 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Goebel v. Denver & Rio Grande Western RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
  2. In re Mirena IUD Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  3. In Re Rezulin Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
  4. Henricksen v. ConocoPhillips Co.District Court, E.D. Washington · 2009
  5. In Re Meridia Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API