Legal Opinion

Henricksen v. ConocoPhillips Co.

District Court, E.D. Washington

Decided February 11, 2009No. CV-07-224-JLQPublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTIONS; ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

JUSTIN L. QUACKENBUSH, Senior District Judge.

The court has had under advisement the following eleven motions.

1. Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Opinions of Dr. Catón Based on Disclosure Violations (Ct. Rec. 67);

2. Defendant’s Motion in Limine to Limit the Testimony of Plaintiffs’ Treating Physicians (Ct. Rec. 71);

3. Defendant’s Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Plaintiffs’ Expert Witness Frank Gardner (Ct. Rec. 75);

4. Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Dose Opinions of Expert Sawyer due to Disclosure…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Betz v. Pneumo Abex LLCSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Ranes v. Adams Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2010
  3. Baker v. Chevron USA, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
  4. Anne Payne v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Yates v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2015

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API