Legal Opinion
Goebel v. Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 9, 2003No. 02-1391PublishedCited by 114 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge.
In June 1999, Plaintiff-Appellee Richard W. Goebel obtained a $755,000 jury verdict against his employer, Defendant-Appellant The Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad Company (“Railroad”), for injuries suffered on the job. The Railroad appealed and we concluded that the district court failed to perform its gatekeeper function and thus abused its discretion by admitting the testimony of plaintiff expert Dr. Daniel Teitelbaum. Goebel v. Denver and Rio Grande W. R.R. Co., 215 F.3d 1083, 1088 (10th Cir.2000) (“Goebel I ”). Accordingly, we reversed and remanded for…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Farm Credit Bank of WichitaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by114 opinions
- Gregory Johnson v. Arkema, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- Miller v. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Bitler v. A.O. Smith Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Linda Messick v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Attorney General of Oklahoma v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.