Introducing Exa PlacesLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re Mirena IUD Products Liability Litigation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 8, 2016No. 13-MD-2434 (CS); 13-MC-2434 (CS); 13-CV-6586 (CS); 14-CV-288 (CS)PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

Seibel, United States District Judge.

Table of Contents

I.Background.. .408

A. Background Applicable to Both Cases.. .408

B. Background Related to Jennifer Dan-ley. . .410

C. Background Related to Christie Hayes.. .411

II. Discussion.. .411

A. Legal Standard.. .411

B. Defendants’ Clinical Experts.. .418

1. Experts’ Qualifications & Opinions. . .415

2. Opinions on Secondary Perforation. . .418

3. Opinions on the Mirena Label.. .422

4. Opinions on 2D Versus 8D Ultrasound. . :424

5. Opinions on Epidemiology.. .426

6. Conflicting Bayer Statements and Documents.. .426

C. Plaintiffs’ Causation…

2Cases cited97 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  5. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. Tardif v. City of N.Y.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. In re Mirena IUD Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  3. In re Mirena Ius Levonorgestrel-Related Prods. Liab. Litig.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  4. In re Mirena Ius Levonorgestrel-Related Prods. Liab. Litig. (No. II)District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
  5. Rochkind v. StevensonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API