In Re Kennerly
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilbur, C. J.
The petitioner was convicted of having intoxicating liquor in his possession. It was his first offense. The penalty therefor under the Wright Act was a fine of not exceeding five hundred dollars. He was fined five hundred dollars and in addition it was directed that he be imprisoned in the county jail of the county of Fresno until the fine be satisfied, in the proportion of one day’s imprisonment for every dollar of the fine.
The petitioner’s application is based upon the proposition that inasmuch as the state law provides no term of imprisonment for the first offense of having liquor in…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ex parte RosenheimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- In Re GarnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Ex parte WadleighCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Ex Parte KarlsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Ex parte MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re GarrityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- In Re CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Hart Bros. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- People v. SayerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Ex Parte GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.