Ex Parte Karlson
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus directed to the Sheriff of Los Angeles County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
Petitioner has been held in custody by the sheriff of the county of Los Angeles on a commitment for contempt of court consisting of a violation of an injunction issued by the superior court in the case of the Pacific Ornamental Iron Works (a corporation), v. Metal Trades Council, Los Angeles, California, an association, Louis Karlson et al. It is unnecessary to review in detail the acts of Karlson found by the court to constitute the contempt for which he has been fined. It is sufficient to say that they were in violation of the injunction.
Petitioner’s principal and only serious objection…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- New Orleans v. Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1874
- In re TylerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Ex parte CrittendenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Hathcock v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
- State v. ManningTexas Supreme Court · 1855
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Martin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Bridges v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Lay v. District Court, Fourth Judicial DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1948
- In Re MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- In Re CiraoloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.