Ex parte Miller
California Supreme Court
Application for a writ of habeas corpus. The facts stated are in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus. The principal ground of the application is, that the petitioner, upon a trial for a violation of an ordinance of the board of supervisors of Sutter County, was by the justice’s court denied a jury, and upon a trial by the justice convicted and fined one hundred dollars. The offense charged was not a felony, and a jury might have been waived. The return of the officer to the alternative writ shows a valid commitment by a court having jurisdiction of the subject-matter and of the party. If a jury trial was denied, it was a mere error which…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kelly v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
- Ex parte McCulloughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Zelle v. McHenrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
- Ex parte Chin YanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Turney v. BarrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Cooley v. WilderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
- In re FifeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Ex Parte PlaistridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Oswald v. MartinArizona Supreme Court · 1950
- Winnovich v. EmeryUtah Supreme Court · 1908
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.