Legal Opinion

Ex parte Wadleigh

California Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1890No. 20589PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Application for a writ of habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.

This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner is confined in the state prison under a conviction of felony, and sentenced to the state prison for five years, and that he pay a fine of one thousand dollars, and be imprisoned in said prison until said fine is satisfied, at the rate of one day for each one dollar of said fine.

It is alleged in the petition: “ That during his imprisonment the said Wadleigh has faithfully fulfilled all the duties assigned to him, and has obeyed the rules and regulations of said prison, and has therefore earned the credits and deductions from…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ex parte ArrasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Stephens v. ConleyMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Ex parte RosenheimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. People v. JoyceIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Ex Parte RidleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Way v. Superior Court of San Diego Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1977

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API