Ex parte Rosenheim
California Supreme Court
Application to the Supreme Court for writ of habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.
— The petitioners are before us on a writ of habeas corpus. They ivere convicted in the police court of the city and county of San Francisco, December 10, 1888, of the crime of conspiracy, and sentenced respectively to serve a term of one year in the county jail, and to pay a fine, each, of one thousand dollars, and in default of payment thereof at the expiration of the one-year term of imprisonment, to be confined in said jail until the fine be paid, at the rate of one day for every dollar thereof.
The first point made by counsel for petitioner is, that the complaint under which they were…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ex parte WadleighCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- People v. RighettiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Ex parte NeustadtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by69 opinions
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Carlos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- People ex rel. Lungren v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. AveryCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re ConnorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.