Hart Bros. v. County of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, P. J.
After defendant’s demurrer to the complaint was overruled, judgment as prayed for was rendered against it by default, from which it appeals. From the complaint, it appears that plaintiff, at the request of the marshal of the Municipal Court of the City of Los Angeles, furnished meals and lodging and transportation to and from the lodging place for the trial jury sitting in a criminal case then on trial in said municipal court and the bailiff in charge of them, while said jury were being kept together during the progress of the trial and after their retirement for deliberation. The marshal…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Brydonjack v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Millholen v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Nicholl v. KosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- People v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- In Re HerronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bloniarz v. RolosonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Arc Investment Co. v. TiffithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Washington Township Hospital District v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Fursdon v. County of Los AngelesAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1950
- Fursdon v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.