Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Emaus

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided December 8, 1949No. Civ. A. No. 1163PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STARR, District Judge.

This is a patent-infringement suit involving letters patent No. 2,165,069 issued July 4, 1939, to plaintiff Reynolds for a “fan” to be used as a blower or exhaust in connection with air conditioning.

In his complaint plaintiff alleged infringement of patent and unfair business competition 'and asked for an injunction against further infringement and unfair competition, an accounting for profits, triple damages, costs of suit, and attorneys’ fees. Defendants answered, alleging invalidity of patent and denying infringement and unfair business competition. In support of…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Spring-Air Co. v. RagainsDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1951
  2. Gagnier Fibre Products Co. v. Fourslides, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1953
  3. Kawneer Co. v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1952
  4. Breeden v. Attwood Brass WorksDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1952
  5. Hope Basket Co. v. Product Advancement Corp.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API