Legal Opinion

Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 28, 1938No. 608PublishedCited by 381 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice RobeRts

The District Court 1 and the Circuit Court of Appeals 2 have held the petitioner guilty of contributory infringement of the Butler Patent No. 1,593,791. We granted certiorari because of alleged conflict with our decision in Rogers v. Alemite Corporation, reported with Bassick Manufacturing Co. v. Hollingshead Co., 298 U. S. 415. Like that in the Rogers case, the patent in suit has to do with apparatus for lubricating bearings, especially those of automobiles, by the use of a nipple or fitting connected with the bearing, a gun consisting of a compressor or pump for propelling the lubricant…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Deering v. Winona Harvester WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Pickering v. McCulloughSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Burt v. EvorySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Heald v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  5. Office Specialty Manufacturing Co. v. Fenton Metallic Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1899

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by381 opinions

  1. Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Anderson's-Black Rock, Inc. v. Pavement Salvage Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Jungersen v. Ostby & Barton Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949

376 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API