Legal Opinion
Hope Basket Co. v. Product Advancement Corp.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided February 17, 1950No. 1104PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STARR, District Judge.
This suit involves principally questions as to the rights of the parties under five royalty license agreements dated April 1, 1930, and as to the validity of Sc'hmidtke basket patent No. 1,895,586 issued January 31, 1933.
The material facts necessary for a determination of the decisive issues in the case are not in dispute. The plaintiff Hope Basket Company, an Arkansas corporation, is engaged in the manufacture of baskets at Hope, Arkansas. The plaintiff Walter Ver-halen Company, a partnership, of Dallas, Texas, successor to a former partnership of the same name, is the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Ohio Brass Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
- Saranac Automatic MacHine Corp. v. Wirebounds Patents Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Traitel Marble Co. v. U. T. Hungerford Brass & Copper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- Remington Rand Business Service, Inc. v. Acme Card System Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1934
- Campbell v. MuellerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hope Basket Co. v. Product Advancement Corp.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1952
- Hope Basket Co. v. Product Advancement Corp. Product Advancement Corp. v. Hope Basket Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1951
- Product Advancement Corp. v. Paducah Box & Basket Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1953