Legal Opinion
Spring-Air Co. v. Ragains
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided January 29, 1951No. Civ. A. 1268PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STARR, District Judge.
Plaintiff Spring-Air Company, a corporation, of Holland, Michigan, successor to the Charles Karr Company, is principally engaged in the manufacture of spring structures for use in the making of mattresses. The defendants, doing business as the Wire Products Company of Holland, Michigan, are also engaged in the manufacture of spring structures for use in mattresses.
On January 31, 1949, plaintiff filed complaint alleging wilful infringement of the following United States Letters Patent: No. 1,887,058 issued November 8, 1932 (expired November 8, 1949) for a spring assembly;…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Consolidated Electrodynamics Corporation, a Corporation v. Midwestern Instruments, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
- De Burgh v. KINDEL FURNITURE COMPANYDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1954
- Belden v. Air Control Products, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1956
- Kawneer Co. v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1952
- Breeden v. Attwood Brass WorksDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.