Legal Opinion

Sinclair & Carroll Co. v. Interchemical Corp.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 28, 1945No. 656PublishedCited by 362 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jackson

This infringement suit was brought by the assignees of a patent on a printing ink. Respondent, Interchemical Corporation, asserts that inks made by the petitioner infringe on claims 3, 10, 11, 12 and 13 of U. S. Patent No. 2,087,190 which was issued to Albert E. Gessler on July 13,1937. Claim 3, which is typical, is as follows: “A print ing ink which is substantially non-drying at ordinary temperatures and dries instantly on heating of the printed matter, consisting of coloring matter dispersed in an organic viscous vehicle consisting of a liquid component and a solid component completely…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Hartford-Empire Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Slawson v. Grand Street RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  4. Cover v. SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  5. Phillips v. DetroitSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by362 opinions

  1. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. RoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Cardinal Chemical Co. v. Morton International, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Multiform Desiccants, Inc., Plaintiff-Cross v. Medzam, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998

357 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API