Legal Opinion

Breeden v. Attwood Brass Works

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided June 26, 1952No. 1423PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STARR, District Judge.

This is a patent suit involving United States Letters Patent No. 2,206,762 issued July 2, 1940, to plaintiff Breeden for “holders for caskets or the like” on application filed October 12, 1938.

In his complaint plaintiff alleged infringement and asks for an injunction against further infringement, an accounting, treble damages, costs of suit, and attorney’s fees. Defendant answered, alleging invalidity of patent and denying infringement, and asks for costs of suit. In support of its claim of invalidity of patent because of prior-art anticipation and lack of invention,…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  5. Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Autogiro Company of America v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  2. Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. Sales Affiliates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  3. B & M Corp. v. Koolvent Aluminum Awning Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1957
  4. Autogiro Company of America v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API