Legal Opinion
Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 9, 1940No. Nos. 9, 10, 11PublishedCited by 260 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone
*
Decision in these cases turns on the question whether, in the light , of the patent-office history of the Jardine patent on a piston for gas engines, the court below, in construing the specifications and claims, erroneously included one element, “flexible” or “yielding” webs, in the patented combination.
A related question was considered .by this Court in-connection with the Gulick and Maynard patents, also involved in this litigation, in Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co., 305 U. S. 47. Respondent, the Cleveland Trust Company, is the assignee in trust under a pooling agreement of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Sibbach v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Carnegie Steel Co. v. Cambria Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Altoona Publix Theatres, Inc. v. American Tri-Ergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Smith v. SnowSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- I. T. S. Rubber Co. v. Essex Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by260 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Autogiro Company of America v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
255 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.