Legal Opinion

Matter of Meeder

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 4, 1997No. 24663PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney disciplinary matter, Respondent Arthur T. Meeder is charged with misconduct arising out of his representation of a client while under an order of suspension by this Court. We agree with the finding of misconduct made by the Interim Review Committee 1 of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline (“IRC”). We further agree with the IRC’s unanimous recommendation Respondent be disbarred from the practice of law.

On October 30, 1995, Respondent was suspended from the practice of law for eleven months. 2 The misconduct alleged in the current complaint involves…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In the Matter of TreacySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  2. People v. RedmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  3. Matter of Disciplinary Action Against LarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. In the Matter of BossermanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  5. Matter of HendricksSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re HallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. In Re MurphSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  3. In Re JacobsenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  4. In Re KitchelSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  5. In re MeederSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API