In Re Kitchel
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Per curiam
In this attorney disciplinary matter, the Commission on Lawyer Conduct (the Commission) filed formal charges against Respondent Dirk J. Kitchel. Respondent did not respond by way of answer or motion to the charges. The subpanel granted the Commission’s motion to hold respondent in default and deemed respondent’s failure to respond to the formal charges an admission of the factual allegations. The subpanel’s order notified respondent he could present mitigating evidence at the hearing.
Respondent appeared at the hearing before the subpanel. He admitted he did not timely respond to the two…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In the Matter of TreacySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
- Matter of ThorntonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
- In Re HallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- In Re StraitSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Matter of MeederSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re MurphSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- In re TrexlerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- Branch Banking & Trust Co v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- In re KitchelSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004