Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Bosserman

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 24, 1989No. 23008PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney grievance proceeding, respondent has been charged with numerous acts of misconduct. Respondent admits the material allegations against him and consents to disbarment. We accept respondent’s admission and disbar him. The facts alleged by the complaint are as follows:

Mazzell Matter

In March 1987, Paul Mazzell retained respondent to represent him in post-conviction relief proceedings. Respondent requested and received a $3,500.00 retainer fee, plus an additional $5,000,000 to associate another attorney on the case. The fees were paid by Mazzell’s sister, Hilma Duncan.

Mazzell and…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Matter of RivkindArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. MI Co., Ltd. v. McLeanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  3. Matter of HendricksSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
  4. Matter of MeederSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  5. Matter of FullwoodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API