Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Hall

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 30, 1998No. 24860PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney grievance matter, Mark E. Hall (Respondent) is charged with engaging in misconduct in violation of various provisions of the Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC) contained in Rule 407, SCACR, and the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (RLDE) contained in Rule 413, SCACR.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The Commission on Lawyer Conduct (Commission) began a full investigation into these matters in April and June 1997. Respondent initially denied any wrongdoing, but provided incomplete information to investigators. He did not respond after the filing of formal charges in October 1997…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In the Matter of TreacySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  2. In the Matter of SiflySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  3. Matter of DobsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  4. Matter of LakeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  5. Matter of WoffordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. In Re ChastainSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. In Re MurphSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  3. In re Van SonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
  4. In re BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  5. In Re BoneySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API