Legal Opinion

In Re Jacobsen

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 1, 2010No. 26783PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an attorney disciplinary matter involving multiple allegations of misconduct arising out of Karl P. Jacobsen’s (Respondent’s) operation of his bankruptcy practice. After a full investigation, the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) filed formal charges against Respondent with the Commission on Lawyer Conduct (the Commission). Respondent did not file an Answer and, as a result, was found to be in default. After a hearing, 1 a Hearing Panel of the Commission (the Panel) recommended that Respondent be disbarred and ordered to pay costs in the amount of $552.37. Additionally, the Panel…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re ThompsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. In Re GreeneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  3. Matter of MarshallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  4. In Re TullisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  5. In the Matter of SiflySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re PrendergastSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  2. In Re BoneySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  3. In the Matter of Nathan JardineSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
  4. In Re HurseySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  5. In re LundgrenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API