Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Treacy

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 1, 1982No. 21682PublishedCited by 105 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter, involving Respondent, Patrick E. Treacy, a practicing attorney in South Carolina, is before the Court for final action because a Hearing Panel and the Executive Committee of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline found him guilty of misconduct as defined in the Rule on Disciplinary Procedure for attorneys. Both the Panel and the Board recommended that the Respondent be publicly reprimanded.

The Complaint filed against the Respondent alleges, in essence, that a Mr. Jackie paid him $500 to pursue the matter of recovering an amount in dispute held by the South…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Burns v. ClaytonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960

3Cited by105 opinions

  1. Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. HornSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  2. In Re HallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  3. In Re HazzardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  4. Matter of BallardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  5. In Re PrendergastSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API