Legal Opinion

Matter of Hendricks

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 18, 1995No. 24324PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney grievance matter, the Hearing Panel recommended indefinite suspension. The Executive Committee concurred with the Panel’s finding of misconduct but recommended respondent be disbarred. We agree with the finding of misconduct and disbar respondent from the practice of law.

Fripp IslandVilla'Matter

Respondent was a member'of a partnership which owned two villas- at Fripplsland encumbered by ai$140,000 mortgage on both units. Respondent was the closing attorney -for the Osbornes who! purchased one of the villas, ownediby the partnership, for $81,000. Respondent received all "of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Matter of ChastainSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  2. In the Matter of BossermanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  3. In the Matter of GibbesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  4. In the Matter of BowersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  5. Rutland v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re ThompsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Matter of MeederSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  3. Ausherman v. Bank of America Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2002
  4. In re AtwaterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  5. Matter of FloydSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API